Nepal on Fire: Where It Started, Why It Happened, and What’s Next

By Mohammed Bello Doka 

Nepal is facing one of the most turbulent moments in its recent history as a wave of youth-led protests has shaken the nation, leaving more than 55 people dead and forcing Prime Minister K. P. Sharma Oli to resign. What began as a call for accountability has transformed into a full-blown uprising, raising urgent questions about the future of democracy in the Himalayan nation.

Where It Started

The protests were sparked in Kathmandu, where young activists—many of them students and first-time voters—mobilized through social media to demand an end to corruption and mismanagement. Armed with placards and chants of “No more lies, no more corruption,” they poured into the streets, frustrated by years of broken promises and worsening unemployment.

I came out because I am tired of leaders stealing our future,” said 22-year-old student Anisha Gurung. “We studied, we worked hard, but there are no jobs—only corruption. This is our revolution.”
The government’s attempt to silence dissent by banning social media platforms and imposing an internet blackout backfired, triggering even greater anger and accelerating the spread of protests to Pokhara, Biratnagar, and several other towns across the country.

Why It Happened

At the heart of the crisis lies deep discontent with Nepal’s political establishment. Analysts argue that the country’s youth, who form a significant proportion of the population, feel betrayed by a system that has failed to deliver economic opportunities, accountability, or transparency.
Nepal’s Gen Z has grown up in a democracy that has consistently disappointed them,” said political analyst Ramesh Shrestha. “This revolt is not just about corruption—it is about an entire generation demanding a different future.”

According to a report by Al Jazeera, Oli’s administration was already facing widespread criticism over alleged misuse of public funds, suppression of press freedom, and authoritarian tendencies. The violent crackdown on demonstrators, with security forces accused of using live ammunition, further inflamed tensions. Families of slain protesters joined the demonstrations, lending the movement an emotional and moral weight.

A grieving father, whose 19-year-old son was killed during clashes in Kathmandu, told local reporters: “He only wanted a better country. They killed him for shouting the truth. We will not stop until there is justice.”

When It Escalated

The crisis deepened after reports emerged of prison breaks in several districts, coinciding with widespread clashes between protesters and security forces. Curfews were imposed, and the military was deployed to restore order, yet the demonstrations only grew stronger.

They used bullets, tear gas, and batons against unarmed youth,” said activist Kiran Basnet. “This was not policing—it was a massacre.”

International human rights groups swiftly condemned the violence, while regional powers and Western governments urged dialogue and restraint. Amid mounting pressure, Oli’s political support collapsed. On September 10, he resigned, marking a dramatic end to his tenure.
What’s Next

Oli’s resignation has not quelled the unrest. Protesters insist that they will not accept cosmetic changes or recycled leadership from the same political class. Their demands include justice for victims, accountability for corruption, and deep structural reforms.

The resignation is just the beginning,” said protest leader Suman Adhikari. “If the next government thinks it can continue with business as usual, they are mistaken. We are here to rebuild Nepal, not to be betrayed again.”

Observers warn that Nepal now stands at a crossroads. The country has an opportunity to heed the voices of its youth and implement reforms, but failure to do so could plunge the nation into prolonged instability.
Nepal must act decisively,” said political scientist Dr. Meera Tamang. “This is not simply about one leader—it is about whether the democratic project itself can survive in the face of generational disillusionment.”

A Global Pattern

Nepal’s turmoil is part of a wider global wave of youth-led uprisings that have reshaped political landscapes. In Nigeria, the 2020 EndSARS protests saw young people rise against police brutality, forcing the government into concessions while leaving a lasting impact on political discourse. In Sri Lanka, mass youth-driven demonstrations in 2022 toppled President Gotabaya Rajapaksa after years of corruption and economic mismanagement. And during the Arab Spring, young protesters across North Africa and the Middle East shook regimes once thought untouchable.

In each case, a common thread emerges: when corruption, repression, and lack of opportunity converge, it is the younger generation—socially connected, politically restless, and unwilling to accept the failures of the past—that leads the charge for change.
For now, Nepal’s streets remain charged with anger and determination, a powerful reminder that when a nation’s youth are pushed to the margins, they will rise to reclaim their future.

And as history has shown time and again, when the youth rise, nations either change—or collapse under the weight of their refusal to listen.


Post a Comment

Share your thoughts with ANN..

Previous Post Next Post