Who is Afraid?: A Critique of the Allegations Against Nasir El-Rufai

By Mohammed Bello Doka

The petition purportedly penned by the "Kaduna State Concerned Citizens (KSCC)" emerges as a veiled attempt at political sabotage rather than a genuine call for accountability. This shadowy group, devoid of transparency and political relevance, appears to be nothing more than a front for sponsored political agendas aimed at undermining the rising influence of former Governor Nasir El-Rufai, particularly in the lead-up to the 2027 general elections.

Upon dissecting the allegations laid forth in the petition, it becomes evident that they lack substance and credibility, resembling more of a political smear campaign than a well-founded critique. The accusations of squandering, looting, and mismanagement of public funds, alongside claims of state civil service bastardization, are presented without tangible evidence or specific instances to substantiate these grave allegations. The absence of concrete proof undermines the petition's credibility and exposes it as a mere tool for character assassination.

The narrative woven within the petition relies heavily on hyperbolic language and sensationalized claims, aiming to incite public outrage rather than foster genuine discourse on governance issues. By painting a bleak picture of governance under Nasir El-Rufai's administration, the petition seeks to manipulate public sentiment and undermine his political credibility without engaging in constructive dialogue or evidence-based criticism.

Moreover, the timing of the petition, coinciding with the ascendancy of Nasir El-Rufai as a prominent political figure in Northern Nigeria, suggests ulterior motives driven by the fear of his potential impact on the upcoming elections. This strategic timing exposes the petition's underlying political agenda and raises questions about its authenticity and impartiality.

In essence, the allegations presented in the petition should be met with skepticism and critical scrutiny, given their unsubstantiated nature and apparent political motivations. Rather than serving as a catalyst for accountability and transparency, this petition stands as a testament to the divisive nature of Nigerian politics, where smear tactics and political maneuvering overshadow genuine efforts for good governance.

Overall, the petition against former Governor Nasir El-Rufai epitomizes the dangers of political witch hunts and underscores the importance of discerning fact from fiction in the realm of public discourse and accountability.

Let us examine the Kaduna's economic renaissance under Governor El-Rufai which by extension can be seen as an examination of his tenure. 

Kaduna, a state once grappling with economic challenges, has witnessed a remarkable transformation under the leadership of Governor Nasir El-Rufai. From the onset of his administration in 2015, El-Rufai embarked on a mission to revitalize the state's economy, and the results speak volumes.

One of the most notable achievements of El-Rufai's tenure is the significant increase in Kaduna's Internally Generated Revenue (IGR). From a meager N11 billion in 2015, the state's IGR soared to an impressive N62 billion by 2023. This surge can be attributed to the implementation of efficient collection mechanisms and the establishment of a robust industrial base.

El-Rufai's proactive approach also attracted substantial investments, totaling over $4.48 billion, which catalyzed the creation of approximately 750,000 direct and indirect jobs in Kaduna State. Despite facing security challenges, Kaduna, lacking the advantages of states like Kano, Lagos, or Ogun, flourished under El-Rufai's visionary leadership.

Under El-Rufai's stewardship, Kaduna became a magnet for industries, with more than 70 companies setting up operations in the state between 2015 and 2023. This influx of businesses not only boosted IGR but also spurred economic growth through increased tax revenues and related activities.

The World Bank's Sub-national "Doing Business Report 2018" recognized Kaduna as the most improved place for doing business in Nigeria. The state ranked number one for registering titles, enforcing contracts, fifth for starting a business, and seventeenth for issuing construction permits—a testament to the impactful reforms spearheaded by the El-Rufai administration.

Critics can argue against El-Rufai's borrowing for infrastructure projects, but the tangible economic gains justify these investments. The state's positive economic trajectory under El-Rufai's tenure has positioned it to absorb additional borrowing without significant repercussions, further fueling its development.

Governor El-Rufai's exemplary performance has set a high bar for his successors. His track record as the best Director-General of the Bureau of Public Enterprises, the best Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, and the best Governor of Kaduna State since 1999 underscores his unmatched competence and capacity.

In conclusion, El-Rufai's tenure as Governor of Kaduna State has been defined by unprecedented economic growth, innovation, and transformation. While criticisms based on sentiment and bigotry persist and the fear of the rising political influence of the Mallam, the undeniable progress achieved under his leadership cements his legacy as a visionary leader who has reshaped the economic landscape of Kaduna State.

On the other hand the allegations against Mallam Nasir El-rufai can be examined In light of the recent FAAC allocation figures for January and February 2024 unveiled by Bashir El-Rufai culled from statisense, a contentious debate has erupted regarding the financial management practices of the Kaduna State government. While some critics have echoed Governor Uba Sani's sentiments, attributing the state's financial challenges to loans secured by his predecessor, Governor El-Rufai, others remain skeptical of such assertions.

The FAAC data, coupled with internally generated revenue (IGR), has prompted Governor Uba Sani's critics to question his leadership capabilities. With a net allocation of ₦17.52 billion for the state government and ₦18.22 billion for local governments, totaling ₦35.74 billion after deductions, concerns have been raised about the adequacy of these funds to cover essential expenditures, particularly staff salaries.

Governor Uba Sani's assertion that the state government is constrained by loans secured during Governor El-Rufai's tenure has sparked intense scrutiny. Critics argue that the substantial FAAC allocation, alongside IGR, should provide ample resources to meet salary obligations. They contend that if the deductions are accurately accounted for, there should be no reason for the government to struggle with personnel expenses.

However, supporters of Governor Uba Sani have defended his administration, citing the purported financial burdens inherited from the previous administration. They argue that Governor El-Rufai's policies, including the acquisition of loans, have placed significant strain on the state's finances, making it challenging for the current administration to meet its obligations.

As the discourse intensifies, the people of Kaduna State remain divided on the issue, with both sides presenting compelling arguments. The controversy surrounding the FAAC allocation figures underscores the pressing need for transparency and accountability in governance, as citizens await concrete action from their elected leaders to address the state's financial challenges.

Post a Comment

Share your thoughts with ANN..

Previous Post Next Post