by Mohammed Bello Doka
1 July, 2026.
Every few months, Nigeria's opposition leaders gather under bright lights, sign a declaration, shake hands for the cameras, and promise the country a united front against President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in 2027. Every few months, that same coalition is back in court, back in factions, and back to square one. The pattern is now so reliable you could set a calendar by it — and that, more than anything Aso Rock has done, is the real story of Nigeria's road to 2027.
The Ibadan Mirage
On April 25, 2026, opposition heavyweights — Atiku Abubakar, Peter Obi, Rabiu Kwankwaso, Rotimi Amaechi, Rauf Aregbesola, Seyi Makinde, and party chairmen from the PDP, ADC, NNPP, and Labour Party — gathered in Ibadan and signed what they called a historic declaration: a single, consensus presidential candidate to face the APC in 2027, the only way, they argued, to avoid repeating the fatal arithmetic of 2023, when a split opposition vote handed Tinubu the presidency on a plurality.
It took less than a week for that promise to start unravelling.
Nine Weeks of Self-Destruction
Five days after Ibadan, on April 30, 2026, the Supreme Court delivered a double blow: it restored the David Mark-led leadership of the ADC while simultaneously nullifying the PDP's own Ibadan convention in a split 3-2 ruling, voiding the Tanimu Turaki-led leadership the party had installed months earlier. Almost overnight, the PDP found itself with two rival factions claiming legitimacy — the Board of Trustees under Adolphus Wabara on one side, the Turaki camp on the other — arguing in public over who even led the party, let alone who it would nominate for president.
The ADC fared no better. The same week, a Federal High Court barred INEC from recognizing congresses conducted by the Mark-led caretaker leadership, and Nigeria's Attorney-General filed a fresh suit seeking the party's outright deregistration. The vehicle the coalition had built its 2027 hopes around was now fighting for its own survival in three different courtrooms at once.
Then came the defections. Peter Obi and Kwankwaso walked out of the ADC, citing "destabilising forces" and internal division. Within 48 hours, the new home they chose — the NDC — picked up 17 House members, a senator, and a wave of defectors openly blaming the ADC's dysfunction "from the ward to the national level." Obi insisted his exit wasn't personal. But insiders pointed to the real trigger: Atiku's refusal to step aside for a Southern consensus candidate and the ADC's failure to agree on zoning — the very question Ibadan was convened to settle.
Two of PDP's last remaining major governors, Bala Mohammed of Bauchi and Seyi Makinde of Oyo, didn't even bother with the ADC. Mohammed's APC defection talks collapsed on April 18 over a power-sharing dispute; on May 3, just over a week after Ibadan, he defected instead to the Allied Peoples Movement. Makinde — who had personally ruled out joining APC in a January 2026 meeting with Tinubu at Aso Rock, declaring "I am comfortable in the PDP" — also ended up aligning with the APM, declaring his own intention to contest the presidency on that platform. PDP's two most prominent surviving governors had skipped the entire "unity" coalition and built a fourth, separate vehicle.
Then, on June 26, the NDC itself was hit: a Federal High Court in Lokoja set aside its own December 2025 judgment recognizing the party, effectively threatening its deregistration just as the candidate nomination window opened. INEC briefly denied the party its nomination access code — "they told us they will get back to us," party officials said — before reversing course within 72 hours under appeal pressure, allowing Obi's name to be uploaded as presidential candidate alongside Kwankwaso as running mate.
In the middle of that crisis, NDC's national leader, Seriake Dickson, went on television to declare the party "open" to coalition talks with the ADC — but on terms that preserved NDC's own candidates rather than conceding to a fresh joint ticket. "Let the ADC be on the ballot. Let the NDC be on the ballot. Let the APM be on the ballot," he said — pluralism dressed up as unity, fragmentation dressed up as principle.
That is the full arc, start to finish: one declaration, four parties (ADC, NDC, APM, and a PDP split into two warring factions), three separate court crises, and not a single consensus candidate — all in roughly nine weeks.
Gullible Is the Generous Word
Each leader who walked away from Ibadan had a noble-sounding reason. Each time, the real reason was narrower: who controls the ticket, who gets zoned out, who keeps their structure intact. The opposition didn't fail because Tinubu out-maneuvered them at every turn. It failed because it kept staging unity it had no intention of honoring, and kept being surprised when performance didn't survive contact with ambition.
To be clear, there is evidence that the presidency is doing what any incumbent fighting for survival would do — applying pressure wherever the opposition shows a crack, whether through the courts, through INEC's administrative posture, or through the quiet courting of governors like Bala Mohammed. That is not in dispute. What is also not in dispute is that none of it would matter against a genuinely united opposition. A coalition that actually held — one ticket, one zoning formula, one disciplined front — would have absorbed every one of those pressures and turned them into evidence of persecution, the same way opposition movements elsewhere have used a ruling party's hostility to harden their own unity. Instead, the opposition handed the presidency a roadmap by fracturing on its own terms, faster than any external pressure could have forced it to. The strategy only works on a target that is already gullible enough to do half the work itself.
Why "Genius" Is the Wrong Word for Tinubu
It is tempting, watching this collapse, to credit Tinubu with strategic brilliance. The temptation should be resisted — on two grounds.
First, on the facts: most of what has hurt the opposition has not been the result of any traceable Tinubu intervention. The NDC's dispute traces to an internal logo and registration fight predating any presidential meddling. The PDP's convention was voided over a contempt finding tied to its own defiance of a Federal High Court restraint order — a defiance the party chose. INEC's handling of the NDC was reactive and inconsistent, not a calculated strike: a denial reversed within three days under appeal pressure looks far more like institutional confusion than masterstroke. Even Bala Mohammed's defection — the one move that would have looked like a genuine Tinubu win — fell through; Mohammed went to APM instead of APC. If this is genius, it is genius that keeps failing to close its own deals and is instead living off an opposition that defeats itself for free.
Second, and more fundamentally: genius is not simply the capacity to win. A genius creates something that expands human possibility — a discovery, an invention, a system that leaves people better off than it found them. What does not qualify as genius is the accumulation and entrenchment of power amid deepening poverty.
By the World Bank's own April 2026 reckoning, Nigeria's poverty rate climbed from 56% in 2023 to 63% in 2025 — roughly 140 million Nigerians below the poverty line, even as headline inflation fell from 34.8% to 15.15% over the same period. That gap between cooling inflation and rising poverty is itself damning: the World Bank's lead economist for Nigeria, Fiseha Haile, attributed it to weak job creation and an economy growing on the back of services and oil while agriculture — where more than half the poor work — lagged behind. By March 2026, inflation was already climbing again, to 15.4%, then 15.93% by May, driven by fuel and food price shocks tied to renewed Middle East conflict. The IMF's own June 2026 consultation report put it plainly: "conditions remain difficult for many Nigerians, with poverty and food insecurity likely to worsen." Out of a 15-million-household target for the government's flagship cash transfer programme, only 9.2 million had been enrolled as of that report — and even those received as little as ₦25,000, paid out at most three times since 2023.
A leader who governs through a period like that, while his political opponents hand him every tactical advantage for free, has not displayed genius. He has displayed competence at survival — the oldest, least original skill in Nigerian politics, recycled from the same divide-and-entrench playbook used by predecessors stretching back decades: exploit your opponents' fractures, let institutions move reactively rather than decisively, and let economic hardship become someone else's problem to explain away. None of that is new. None of it required invention. It only required an opposition willing to do the dividing on his behalf.
The Lesson They Refuse to Learn
There is a vital lesson from history that Nigeria's opposition leaders keep failing to absorb: incumbents who are allowed to consolidate power rarely stop at consolidation. If Tinubu secures a second term against a field this fractured, every leader who spent 2026 chasing personal tickets instead of building genuine unity will have done so at their own long-term peril. A divided opposition does not just lose elections — it loses the leverage to negotiate anything afterward, including its own safety.
The deeper pattern worth naming plainly: a presidency this determined to weaken every rival structure — courts, INEC postures, defections, and all — is a presidency working to entrench itself, not merely to win a term. And nowhere in history has a leader who succeeded in building a one-party state then turned around and respected term limits. The two projects — eliminating credible opposition and voluntarily relinquishing power on schedule — have never coexisted. That is the choice now sitting in front of Nigeria's opposition leaders, stripped of euphemism: unite at the ballot box, or risk discovering, too late, that they have all the more reason to unite once they no longer have a ballot box to fight from.
If 2027 ends the way 2023 did, it will not be because Bola Tinubu out-thought Nigeria's opposition. It will be because that opposition, given a second chance to learn from its first catastrophic mistake, chose instead to repeat it — in public, on camera, with a paper trail of court rulings, defections, and contradictory press statements thick enough to write a textbook on how not to build a coalition.
Tinubu is not a genius. He is simply the last man standing in a field where everyone else keeps walking away from the table they built themselves.
The opposition is gullible — not because it was deceived by some master strategist, but because it kept deceiving itself, mistaking press conferences for principle, and convention halls for consensus, all while ordinary Nigerians paid the real price in blood,naira and in hunger.
Mohammed Bello Doka can be reached via [email protected]
Abuja Network News
Tags
Opinion