By Mohammed Bello Doka
In a landmark ruling today at 12:45 pm, the Supreme Court dismissed allegations of over-voting in the Zamfara state election, citing a lack of crucial evidence presented by the petitioner. The presiding judge emphasized that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) failed to provide essential documents such as the voter register, polling unit officer report, and testimonies from individuals present at the polling units.
At 12:47 pm, the judge further clarified that BVAS machines alone cannot establish electoral malpractices. The court firmly stated that the petitioner, Mr. Matawalle, fell short in providing sufficient evidence to support the claims, echoing the tribunal's decision.
"The tribunal was right," declared the judge, adding that the Court of Appeal's judgment was deemed perverse due to the petitioner's failure to substantiate the allegations. The ruling solidifies the legitimacy of the election results and underscores the importance of robust evidence in challenging electoral outcomes.
Tags
News